Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 12-18-2025 Origin: Site
In the world of discrete semiconductors and sensors, TO metal can packages are still very much alive. Despite the rise of plastic and surface-mount packages, TO-5 and TO-39 remain popular wherever engineers need high reliability, good thermal performance, and hermetic sealing.
As a TO-package manufacturer, clearly explaining the differences between TO-5 and TO-39 helps your customers choose the right outline from the start.
This article walks through mechanical dimensions, thermal/power behavior, and typical applications, and also shows how these differences drive real design decisions.
A TO package (Transistor Outline) is a standardized package family originally defined by JEDEC for discrete transistors. Over time, TO metal cans have been used for:
Bipolar & MOS transistors
Voltage regulators and precision references
Operational amplifiers and analog ICs
Sensors (temperature, pressure, gas, optical)
Laser diodes and photodiodes
Typical TO metal can structure:
Header: round metal base with glass-to-metal seals for leads
Leads: usually radial leads emerging from the bottom
Cap: metal cap welded or seam-sealed to the header
Cavity: can be hermetic (dry, sealed cavity) or, in some low-cost variants, non-hermetic
Both TO-5 and TO-39 belong to this classic family:
TO-5: one of the earliest and most widely recognized metal can packages.
TO-39: evolved to offer better thermal capability and slightly larger volume, while keeping a similar footprint.
Both can be supplied with:
Different lead counts (3, 4, 5, 6, 8, etc.)
Hermetic glass-to-metal seals
Optional custom caps (flat, domed, windowed, lensed, etc.)
Both packages share a similar basic structure:
Round metal header with multiple leads.
Metal cap welded or seam-sealed to the header.
Leads arranged on a circular pitch, designed for through-hole PCB mounting or chassis-mount assemblies.
From the outside, they look similar; the key differences are diameter, height, and “thermal mass”.
Exact numbers vary by vendor and JEDEC variant, but the general trends are:
Smaller outline and internal volume
Lower profile, shorter cap height
Suited to lower to medium power and compact designs
Slightly larger cap/header and internal cavity
More surface area for heat dissipation
Better suited to higher power and thermally demanding applications
Parameter | TO-5 (Typical) | TO-39 (Typical) | Design Impact |
Header outside diameter | ~8.5–9.0 mm | ~8.5–9.5 mm | Affects PCB footprint & socket compatibility |
Cap outside diameter | Slightly smaller than header | Similar or slightly larger | Influences cavity volume & optical window size |
Overall package height | Lower profile | Slightly taller | Impacts vertical clearance in enclosure |
Common lead counts | 3, 4, 5, 8 | 3, 4, 5, 8 (or custom) | More leads = more complex functions |
Lead pitch (circle diameter) | Similar range | Similar range | Typically compatible footprints with care |
Approx. package weight | Lower | Slightly higher | Higher mass improves thermal and mechanical robustness |
Typical hermetic construction | Yes | Yes | Both ideal for harsh environments |
The dimensional differences translate into practical design choices:
PCB layout:
TO-5 is ideal when board space and height are tight. TO-39 needs slightly more clearance but offers better thermal headroom.
Mechanical robustness:
The slightly larger and heavier TO-39 can be more robust for applications with vibration, shock, or frequent thermal cycling.
Optical or sensor cavity space:
TO-39’s larger cavity can accommodate bigger die, optics, or sensor structures, useful for laser diodes, photodiodes, and complex sensor assemblies.
For both TO-5 and TO-39, power handling is largely defined by:
RθJC – Junction-to-case thermal resistance
RθJA – Junction-to-ambient thermal resistance
Header material & thickness – How well heat spreads from the die to the case
Mounting conditions – Free air, PCB copper area, or chassis/heat sink attachment
A larger metal surface and more mass generally mean better heat spreading and lower thermal resistance.
In very rough terms (assuming natural convection and no external heat sink):
TO-5: suitable for low to moderate power, e.g., small-signal devices or regulators with modest dissipation.
TO-39: better suited when the device must dissipate more power or operate at higher ambient temperatures.
With proper heat sinking (e.g., clamping the metal can to a chassis), both can handle significantly more power than in free air.
Again, these are indicative engineering-level values only; exact ratings depend on the device design and manufacturer.
Thermal Attribute | TO-5 (Typical Range) | TO-39 (Typical Range) | Comment |
Junction-to-case RθJC | ~15–30 °C/W | ~10–25 °C/W | Larger TO-39 header & cap can yield lower RθJC |
Junction-to-ambient RθJA (free air) | ~80–150 °C/W | ~60–120 °C/W | TO-39 often runs cooler at same power |
Max continuous power @ 25°C, free air (example) | ~0.5–1.0 W | ~0.8–1.5 W | Derated strongly with higher ambient temperature |
Max power with good heat sinking (example) | ~2–3 W | ~3–5 W | Depends heavily on mounting and heat sink design |
Typical operating junction temp range | –55 to +150 °C | –55 to +150 °C | Defined by device technology more than package |
Thermal margin for harsh environments | Moderate | Higher | TO-39 preferred where extra thermal margin is needed |
TO-5 works well for:
Precision references, small amplifiers, small-signal transistors, low-power sensors.
Designs where power dissipation is controlled and compact size is a priority.
TO-39 is a better choice when:
Devices dissipate higher power or operate in high ambient temperatures.
Additional thermal safety margin is required (aerospace, industrial, defense).
Both TO-5 and TO-39 support a range of lead counts:
3 leads: classic transistor or simple sensor.
4–5 leads: regulators, references, amplifiers, bridge sensors.
6–8 or more: multi-function or multi-channel ICs, complex sensor modules.
TO-39’s slightly larger cavity can offer more comfortable routing for higher lead counts or more complex internal wiring, but for many cases the difference is small.
Thanks to glass-to-metal seals, both packages offer:
High insulation resistance
Good dielectric strength between leads and case.
Well-defined creepage and clearance distances around the lead glass seals.
For high-voltage or isolation-critical applications, designers should check:
Maximum working voltage
Creepage/clearance around the header.
Any customer-specific insulation or hipot test requirements.
Assembly guidelines are very similar:
Wave or hand soldering for through-hole leads.
Avoid excessive lead forming right at the glass seal to prevent cracking.
Observe maximum lead temperature and dwell times during soldering.
For hermetic cans, pay attention to:
Cleaning solvents
Flux residues
Mechanical stress during board depaneling or handling
TO-5 is often chosen when compact size and good reliability are required, but power is moderate:
Small-signal transistors and low-power regulators.
Precision analog ICs (references, low-noise amplifiers, instrumentation).
Photodiodes and basic optoelectronic devices.
Temperature sensors, simple gas or pressure sensors.
Low-power signal conditioning modules.
TO-39 is popular where extra thermal headroom or mechanical robustness is needed:
Medium power transistors and driver stages.
Laser diodes and high-output LEDs.
Sensors used in harsh environments:
Industrial temperature/pressure.
Automotive, aerospace, or defense sensing modules.
High-reliability analog circuits with higher dissipation.
Device Type / Use Case | Power / Thermal Demand | Environment | Recommended Package | Reasoning / Notes |
Small-signal transistor | Low | Standard lab/industrial | TO-5 | Compact, sufficient thermal margin |
Precision reference IC | Low–moderate | Stable indoor/industrial | TO-5 | Size + good thermal stability for precision analog |
Medium power transistor driver | Moderate–high | Industrial, automotive | TO-39 | Better heat spreading, higher continuous dissipation |
Laser diode module | Moderate–high | Instrumentation, telecom | TO-39 | Larger cavity, thermal performance important for stability |
Temperature or pressure sensor (mild) | Low–moderate | Indoor / mild environment | TO-5 | Compact and reliable for general sensing |
Harsh-environment sensor (aerospace/defense) | Moderate | Wide temp, vibration, shock | TO-39 | Extra thermal margin and mechanical robustness |
When your customer (or your internal design team) chooses between TO-5 and TO-39, the main questions are:
Power dissipation
How many watts must the device safely dissipate?
What is the max ambient temperature?
Space and height
Is PCB area and enclosure height very limited?
Is a slightly taller package acceptable?
Lead count and pinout complexity
How many pins are needed?
Is there room for comfortable internal routing?
Environment & reliability
Will the device see vibration, shock, wide temperature swings, or radiation?
Is long-term hermetic reliability essential?
Cost and availability
Is the customer open to a larger, slightly higher-cost package for extra margin?
Or is minimal cost and size the top priority?
Choose TO-5 when:
Power dissipation is modest
Compact size and lower profile are important
The environment is not extremely harsh
Choose TO-39 when:
Thermal simulations show limited margin in TO-5
The device must work reliably at higher ambient temps
The application is mission-critical (aerospace, defense, demanding industrial)
Example 1: Low-power analog amplifier
A precision low-noise amplifier dissipates 200–300 mW in a lab/industrial environment. TO-5 is typically sufficient, offering compact size and hermeticity without overkill.
Example 2: Industrial driver in a hot cabinet
A transistor dissipates 1 W continuously inside an enclosure at 70°C ambient. TO-39 is more suitable, giving better thermal margin and long-term reliability.
As a TO package manufacturer, you can differentiate by offering customization on both TO-5 and TO-39:
Different header materials (Kovar, steel, copper alloys)
Cap styles:
Flat caps for standard electronics
Domed caps for extra internal height
Glass or sapphire windows for optical/laser applications
Blackened or plated caps for specific optical or thermal behavior
Lead diameter and lead length adaptable to customer PCB and assembly requirements
Plating systems:
Tin, tin-lead, Ni/Au, Ag, etc.
RoHS-compliant options for global markets
You can also highlight:
Fine and gross leak testing (helium leak methods)
Thermal cycling, temperature shock, and vibration tests
100% testing for aerospace / military-grade parts
This allows you to position TO-5 and TO-39 not just as catalog outlines, but as engineered packaging platforms that you can optimize for each customer’s device.
TO-5 and TO-39 may look similar at first glance, but they serve slightly different roles:
TO-5: compact, reliable, ideal for low-to-moderate power and space-sensitive designs.
TO-39: slightly larger, with better thermal performance and mechanical robustness, well-suited to higher power and harsher environments.
For you as a TO-package manufacturer, explaining these differences in terms of dimensions, power, and applications helps customers choose the right outline early, avoid thermal problems, and maximize reliability.
ABOUT US | CONTACT US | FAQS